Tom + Purple
UPDATED 4/9/08
Tom +
According to associates of Richard Gaikowski that I easily found, Tom Voigt never contacted them for handwriting samples (or anything else). It appears that Tom Voigt didn’t try to verify any allegations before he made them because he doesn’t want the Good Times to end. Or the “donations” to stop rolling in. Is that taxable income?
To reiterate: NO ONE CONTACTED THEM. So much for Tom, Davidmm, Bill and others claiming to leave no stone unturned searching for handwritng samples and other evidence.
Purple’s reign of terror
Update on my speculation about the Tom+Purple axis. Blaine does exist. I was wrong. Friends of Richard Gaikowski have known about Blaine for years. The serial stalker has been accusing Richard Gaikowski of outrageous crimes for decades.
Two more questions for Tom Voigt. Is Blaine the source of your latest revelation about “goatkirk”? If Blaine told you what he told Ed Sanders, that he also witnessed Richard/Zodiac making “sweet love” to Charles Manson, did that raise a red flag about the man’s credibility?
Gullible’s Travels
Tom Voigt has taken his family on a week long vacation, touring Zodiac’s gruesome crime scenes. Doesn’t that sound like the disturbing behavior people are trying but unable to find in Richard Gaikowski’s personality?
Can’t wait for all of Blaine’s new revelations!
Reply to comments
A commenter to my last post wrote “Tom is also very quick to curtail posts concerning discredited information, even when he was the original source.”
I appreciate your defense of the well intentioned members of the forum but are you sure about Tom being quick to curtail posts? The now discredited allegations about Richard Gaikowski, implying that the mugshot was connected to an altercation with Ferrin, are still on the introductory post. Can’t you see how it deceptively sways the novice reader toward Richard Gaikowski’s guilt? The other circumstantial evidence that follows becomes icing on the cake but there is no longer a cake under the icing. Do you see what I mean?
There is more evidence against Blaine than there is against Richard Gaikowski. Blaine claims to have witnessed a Zodiac murder. He claims to be in possession of a victim’s book. Why is it absurd to question someone who claims to know Zodiac?
Doesn’t it seem that Voigt is getting desperate and sloppy? He peaked in 2005 with a movie credit, a radio interview and a busy internet forum. It’s been all downhill since then. His decade-long investment has not panned out. It was time to admit failure or find a new suspect.
Tom wanted something big to happen for the tenth anniversary of his site and he knew Purple Blaine could deliver the goods.
Bystander
Which screwbie are you? SuperDaveOsborn? Baba Bijan? Carl? Kaufman? Graysmith?
Intelligence or GTFO.
Tom Voigt, I think, is too young to have committed the Zodiac crimes. But if you’re talking motive, I think “hit count” wouldn’t be too far off the mark.
Eh. Smells like Sacramento spirit to me. Hi, Dennis. LOL
i agree with you!
You did it! …How did you do it?
I knew Richard Gaikowski. I also know Blaine. The backstory is that Blaine wanted to write for Good Times back when Richard was managing editor. His writing was rejected by R.G.. Factor in a healthy dose of drug addled dissapation and paranoia and you have Blaine’s case against Gaikowski.
I appreciate your point of view.