Where’s the book?

2010 February 8
Posted by Bystander

Zetarded

Zetard Tom Voigt, writing in the unmoderated section of the bystander forum, likes to anonymously ask “Where’s the book?” to irritate Michael Butterfield. We know Butterfield’s book is a work-in-progress and since his writing style suggests it will be a fact driven documentary rather than a POI profile, he’s probably waiting for a break in the case before publishing . The question that comes to mind when I read “Where’s the book?” is to wonder about the status of eHomicide, Tom’s reality show.

Bystander

Your Move

2009 November 3
Posted by Bystander

Unsub received a notice of termination for violating the Bystander forum host’s Terms Of Service (Derogatory/Slanderous Material ), effective Nov. 3rd. He is moving the forum to a new address.Here: http://bystander.no-ip.org/

Who Done It?

  • Did Tom Voigt (or one of his minions) report the violation?

  • Did Tom Voigt (or one of his minions) show some disgruntled former member the way to shut down the  zodiackiller.21.forumer.com? Isn’t their forum just as vulnerable to charges of abuse?

  • Didn’t Voigt think this through (ha) and realize that anyone who was kicked out of the forum for asking the “wrong” question can do something about it and shut down his forum in the same manner? Especially those who were thrown out after paying lifetime memberships.
  • Does Forumer know that Voigt charges a fee to use their forum?
  • Does the IRS?

Report a violation to the zodiackiller.com forum’s host.
Please report any violations to Forumer here.

Is The History Channel The Tom Voigt Of TV Networks?

2009 October 23

Skull Drudgery At MysteryQuest

Emmy award winners Christine Sabat, Bill Hunt and Vincent Kralyevich are the executive producers of MysteryQuest. They are responsible for propagating a confidential informant’s heinous ravings against Richard “Jewell” Gaikowski. These three skull fcukers, consorting with two ex-con grave robbers, facilitated the destruction of a man’s reputation on the flimsiest of evidence.  Hurm.

If Mysteryquest knew the sordid Blaine story before publication of the Zodiac episode they must retract the story, apologise to the Gaikowski family and punish the Executive Producers.

New York Times Op-Ed: MysteryQuest Sucks

More  “sensationalism” from MysteryQuest.  The same half-assed-hoof-hearted research demonstrated in their Zodiac suspect episode gets hammered in a New York Times Op-Ed titled Hitler’s Jaws of Death.  The Op-Ed challenges and debunks a MysteryQuest assertion that Hitler did not commit suicide in his bunker at the end of World War 2. “So suggestions that Hitler did not commit suicide and had escaped from Berlin represent nothing but gratuitous sensationalism.”

ABC News Disagrees Says MysteryQuest Blows

Even more half-assed-hoof-hearted sensationalism from The History Channel. This time they discovered the “missing link“. Heh.

I once thought that House Husband Tom Voigt would never fulfill his dream and get a reality show on The History Channel because he fabricates to get what he wants (and his criminal past). Now, I can see that he’ll blend right in.
.

Bystander

Fight Club

2009 October 1
(updated 10-6)
Sad to witness the decline of the History Channel. Sweeps week grave robbing? Haven’t seen quality investigative journalism like that since Geraldo’s Secrets of Al Capone’s Vault. Hurm.
If you want to try and understand who and  what is behind these allegations about Richard Gaikowski, read this blog, then read Michael Butterfield’s excellent, riveting summary of the Blaine/Gaikowski story and then go join the Bystander Message board and hunt for the real Zodiac.

Unsub, founder of the Bystander Message Board posted the chilling ”Blaine Goldcatchers Confession.mp3

While listening to the audio, remind yourself that Blaine T. Blaine (aka GoldCatcher, Eddie, Smith) is the primary source for most, if not all of the allegations against Gaikowski. He is Tom Voigt’s chief witness for the persecution of Richard Gaikowski. He is also MysteryQuest’s  “confidential informant”.

The two hour audio monologue (set to a looping Hawaiian soundtrack) reveals that Blaine, an ex-con, first met Gaikowski during the late sixties in Northern California. Gaikowski, editor of a popular San Francisco alternative weekly, rejected Blaine’s story submission by suggesting Blaine take it to another alternative weekly. From that early rejection, according to Blaine, their relationship blossomed.


“I was forced in to be a witness to these murders”
…”He would kill someone where I was at and he would tell me about the killing”
-
Blaine


Along comes a spider

Tom Voigt, an ex-con and the warden at zodiackiller.com, needing a new suspect for the 40th anniversary of the Zodiac killings (with its prime media potential), used carefully selected excerpts from this audio to build most of his case against the late Richard Gaikowski. Voigt knew dead men can’t sue.

Gaikowski says to me, Blaine, you’ve been involved in these killings from the beginning.”
-Blaine


Voigt also knew there were too many unbelievable allegations so he hand picked several useful charges and buried the rest. Voigt knew that we would dismiss Blaine’s allegations if we were aware of Blaine’s incredible claims that Gaikowski, an “evil genius”,  was also the Green River Killer, the Unibomber and part of a Beider Minehoff Gang plot to murder President Reagan.
All while maintaining his day job as an editor and his night life reputation as a bon vivant.

“…a murder I was linked to in prison”
-Blaine
More about the Goldcatcher confession MP3: Bystander Message Board

If you want to understand the tragedy of this Blaine/Gaikowski mess, read Michael Butterfield’s insightful summary: http://www.zodiackillerfacts.com/kane.htm

Breakout quotes (from Blaine) “What happened next was that [Detective] Ken Narlow rushed over to Gaikowski’s house, confronting him, taking fingerprints, and hand writing samples, and then cleared him! “.

“He [Ken Narlow] wrote the his first letter, but told Pam Suennen he had cleared Gaikowski, he was not the Zodiac. I called him [Ken Narlow] and he was in a most angry mood at me, and he began to berate me.”

“He said that he [Ken Narlow] had cleared Gaikowski because he [Gaikowski] had shown him a passport with a London, England date for December, 1968.  He [Ken Narlow] said that that proved that he was not the Zodiac.”

“…Narlow suddenly said that he was too busy for me, that I had not a shred of evidence, that the Ms. proved nothing, and when I told him that the Suennen family [a victim's kin] did not believe me wrong he began to threaten me. He said I must not see them again, that I was an agitator, that I was the problem, and he further declared that I was harrassing Gaikowski!”

I found two minor technical errors. Butterfield listed the url of the goldcatcher audio recording incorrectly. It should read:  http://www.humyo.com/F/3199147-473519785
The Bystander Blog is www.by-stander.blog.com

-Bystander

Previous posts
Stalk Stalk All you ever do is stalk (Voigt did jail time!) http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/23/stalk-stalk/
Unrequited Love? (Purple & Gike 4ever) http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/17/unrequited-love-purple-gike-4ever/
Tom + Purple Is it all about the donations? http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/03/tom-purple/
Null and Void Step 1. Fingering a suspect http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/13/null-and-void/
Null and Void Step 2. Weighing the evidence http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/26/null-and-void-step-2/
Purple Haze and The Purloined Book http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/03/25/purple-haze-and-the-purloined-book/



Zodiac Hunter

2008 May 16
Posted by Bystander
Updated
(
New messageboard here. It’s free. unlike Zodiackiller.com.
Voigt-free Zodiac Chat
here)

What you should know about Richard Gaikowski’s accuser



*
Meet Tom Voigt.

As Site Administrator of zodiackiller.com, Tom Voigt has spent ten years trying to solve the case of the serial killer, Zodiac, who terrorized the population of the San Francisco area in the late 1960’s through early 70’s. Over the years, Voigt has accused seven men of being the serial killer. At least six are not guilty.

Before Zodiac, Voigt was the BTK hunter. His chief BTK suspect was not guilty, but he accused him incessantly online until the case was solved. Interestingly, Voigt was in jail on the day they arrested BTK. More on that later. Like BTK and Zodiac, Voigt feels no guilt or remorse for killing the reputation of innocent men and humiliating their families. These false allegations can bring great shame to the suspect’s extended family. In our information society, false charges can never be completely erased. But for Voigt, it’s a great game. A who-done-it with great rewards for the person who cracks the mystery. (Voigt identifies the rewards in his comment, #46 in the Help Wanted post below).

Earlier this year, the tenth anniversary of Voigt’s Zodiac website was approaching. The San Francisco PD had already officially closed the case. Just when it seemed that the Zodiac story was over, Tom Voigt introduced his next mark, newspaper reporter the late Richard Gaikowski, “The best suspect you’ve never heard of.” When I saw Gaikowski’s mugshot for his arrest after an altercation with the Zodiac’s 2nd victim, my strong first impression was that Voigt and researcher Blaine had successfully identified Zodiac. A real life Holmes and Watson!

The evidence was rock solid. If only it were real.
As I kept reading, other zodiackiller forum members questioned the evidence and then the entire story fell apart. Many of us began to realize that the primary evidence was fake and Richard’s sole accuser, Blaine, was not reality-based. Not this reality anyway. Richard Gaikowski was never arrested, the mugshot was fictional (created to illustrate a story Gaikowski wrote for the newspaper), and he never had an altercation with the Zodiac’s victim. Forum members who questioned Blaine’s evidence were dispatched by Voigt to the void, never to be heard from again. You learned that, to survive at the forum, you kept quiet and played along. Just like in prison.

Zodiac Hunter
We now know that in early 2008, Voigt began planning for the 40th Annimversary of the Zodiac’s first killing. Tom knows the media will seek him out so he needed a new suspect fast. Preferably someone dead, to avoid libel laws. So, like two grave diggers, Voigt and Blaine dug up Richard Gaikowski and put him on trial on the Internet, in a courtroom of their own making, with false evidence permitted and no lawyer for the defense.

Seven weeks ago, this blog was created to invite discussion of alternative theories that could not be discussed at Voigt’s site. In the following weeks, we found out that Tom Voigt and chief witness Blaine T Blaine are both convicted jailbirds and their top suspect, Richard Gaikowski, didn’t have a record at all. We also discovered that the FBI examined and interviewed Gaikowski in 1988, in response to accusations by Blaine, and concluded that evidence presented by Blaine “proved negative.” Voigt, in desperate need of a suspect for the 40th anniversary media circus, had dismissed the FBI findings and resurrected a suspect who had already been cleared.

Update:

Voigt’s ability to add vulgar comments to this blog several hours a day wore me down. I can’t keep up with censoring Voigt’s obscenity filled rants so I had to shut down the comments section. At least for now.
If anyone wants to start an alternative zodiac forum at forumer or another anti-zodiackiller.com blog, I’ll provide a constant link. Start a free forum here: http://www.forumer.com/
You can still contact me via the comments to let me know about adding a link.
Up next: Null and Void. A New Suspect

-Bystander

**The Multinomah Stalker mugshot was allegedly taken after an altercation with a female victim. A commenter sent a link to an alleged recent photo of Voigt. The caption is from a comment Tom Voigt wrote about your humble moderator.

Previous posts
Stalk Stalk All you ever do is stalk (Voigt did jail time!) http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/23/stalk-stalk/
Unrequited Love? (Purple & Gike 4ever) http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/17/unrequited-love-purple-gike-4ever/
Tom + Purple Is it all about the donations? http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/03/tom-purple/
Null and Void Step 1. Fingering a suspect http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/13/null-and-void/
Null and Void Step 2. Weighing the evidence http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/26/null-and-void-step-2/
Purple Haze and The Purloined Book http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/03/25/purple-haze-and-the-purloined-book/


Congenital Liars

2008 May 14
Posted by Bystander
UPDATED: A few days ago, clever con Tom Voigt, using a female alias, wrote to a website that linked to this blog. In the email, he/she complained about all of the offensive language on this blog. Of course, regular readers know that Voigt wrote all of the vulgarity. The website forwarded the email with a warning and I tried to censor his vulgarity but got delinked anyway.That’s why Voigt keeps bragging that no one reads this blog. He’s intimidating and threatening the sites that link to this blog.

Voigt seems to have a new witness named Duane.


Voigt is the con and Blaine is the genital


Blaine T Blaine is Tom Voigt’s witness for the persecution of Richard Gaikowski.

Blaine T Blaine is Gaikowski’s principle accuser. Blaine, is identified in a DOJ doc as Blaine T Blaine (aka Purple Blaine, Smith, Purple Blame).
Is Blaine T Blaine a credible witness?
Let’s look at his greatest hits:
  • A FOIA FBI document revealed that Blaine, after failing to persuade the San Francco police that Gaikowski was Zodiac, went to the FBI in 1988 and showed them documents allegedly written by Gaikowski. The FBI investigated Gaikowski, eventually stating that the examination “proved negative.”
Since then, Blaine has produced the bulk of evidence that Voigt and his fanboys use to lubricate their case:
  • Purple Blaine (via Tom Voigt) alleges that the mugshot of Gaikowski came from an altercation with the second female victim. Both allegations have been proven false.
  • Purple Blaine (via Tom Voigt) claims he stole a book from Gaikowski that was signed by victim Paul Stine.
  • Purple Blaine (via Tom Voigt) reveals a published article addressed to Zodiac. He claims that Gaikowski was the actual author of the article, and Gaikowski forced Blaine to sign his name to it.
  • Purple Duane claims that he witnessed Richard killing a man named Smith (same name Blaine has used as an alias) in order to keep Blaine quiet. Why didn’t Richard just kill Blaine? That would keep him quiet.
Tom Voigt, a serial stalker who served hard time, knew that the FBI considered Blaine to be a crackpot yet Voigt based his entire case on Blaine’s evidence.
Stupid to Evil ratio:
Tom Voigt…….. 76/24
Blaine T. Blaine 22/78

Next up: The Stalker of Multinomah. Also, an examination of unsolved crimes in Portland since Voigt moved there from Multinomah to avoid detection.

-Bystander

Previous posts
Stalk Stalk All you ever do is stalk (Voigt did jail time!) http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/23/stalk-stalk/
Unrequited Love? (Purple & Gike 4ever) http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/17/unrequited-love-purple-gike-4ever/
Tom + Purple Is it all about the donations? http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/03/tom-purple/
Null and Void Step 1. Fingering a suspect http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/13/null-and-void/
Null and Void Step 2. Weighing the evidence http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/26/null-and-void-step-2/
Purple Haze and The Purloined Book http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/03/25/purple-haze-and-the-purloined-book/

Help Wanted Weighing the Evidence

2008 May 14
Posted by Bystander

Is there any real evidence?

Help me compile the best evidence to prove Richard Gaikowski was Zodiac.
or
Help me compile the best evidence that would rule out Gaikowski as Zodiac.

Voigt’s site is so full of deception, distortions and circumstantial confetti that it confuses even the most well intentioned researchers.
(Here’s my list of false evidence published at zodiackillers that Voigt has used to muddy the evidence pool: http://by-stander.blog.com/2915907/)
Every allegation made by Blaine T. Blaine that can be verified has been proven false so NO Blaine based claims accepted.
I’ll cull the BEST from your comments and post them here.

-Bystander

from commenters
THE BEST EVIDENCE - Richard Gaikowski was Zodiac
1. “
Gyke” is in the friggin cipher!
2.
I Dont’ know why you think him being in another country over the seas rules him out as a suspect. Because flying back to kill people is something the Zodiac would do! duh.
3.
4.

from commenters
THE BEST EVIDENCE - ruling out Richard Gaikowski
1. Richard wasn’t in the area during a confirmed Zodiac attack on December 20, 1968. He had been in Albany and then traveled to Europe during the second half of 1968.
2. Real cops, who had access to Gaikowski’s vital records ruled him out as a suspect over 20 years ago. They had access to records about his height, weight, date of arrival in San Francisco, model of car and the ability to surreptitiously get fingerprints and hand writing samples.
3. The FBI has already looked at Richard and cleared him. You can go here http://foia.fbi.gov/zodiac/zodiac5.pdf.
Check page 371. They black the names out, but they are talking about Blaine accusing Richard back in 1988. In 1991, Blaine even turned in an envelope and card and some code solution thing that Blaine was accusing Richard of making. Blaine accusing Richard of the code solution book was on Void’s site at one time, but appears to have been deleted or moved. That is because Richard didn’t make the solution booklet. The friggin’ FBI saw no merit in it and most definitely finger printed Richard.

4.

He would have had to be on the moon
A zodiackiller.com fan just wrote: “I Dont’ know why you think him being in another country over the seas rules him out as a suspect. Because flying back to kill people is something the Zodiac would do! duh.”
Here’s the original “duh” test. Weigh your statement using Occams Razor. Occams Razor is often paraphrased as “All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best.”
Ask yourself. Is it likely that in December 1968, Richard Gaikowski, vacationing in the U.K after quitting a difficult three year stint as a reporter in New York, interrupts his R&R with an expensive ele ven hour, 5,000+ mile trip to San Francisco, kills two teens in a remote lovers lane, flys back to the U.K in another expensive eleven hour, 5,000+ mile flight and resumes his vacation?
I can see why you don’t like his alibi. It’s one hell of an alibi and it completely kills Voigt’s case. Remember, Voigt spent an earlier decade falsely accusing several men of being BTK. 0 for 20. That’s one hell of a record to defend.
Previous posts
Stalk Stalk All you ever do is stalk (Voigt did jail time!) http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/23/stalk-stalk/
Unrequited Love? (Purple & Gike 4ever) http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/17/unrequited-love-purple-gike-4ever/
Tom + Purple Is it all about the donations? http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/03/tom-purple/
Null and Void Step 1. Fingering a suspect http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/13/null-and-void/
Null and Void Step 2. Weighing the evidence http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/04/26/null-and-void-step-2/
Purple Haze and The Purloined Book http://by-stander.blog.com/2008/03/25/purple-haze-and-the-purloined-book/


Null and Void - Step 2.

2008 April 26
Posted by Bystander
Null and Void Step 2.

The Void and sidekick Purple Blame weigh the evidence


Stupid to Evil ratio:
Tom Voigt 74/26
Blaine T. Blaine 23/77

Bystander

Stalk Stalk

2008 April 23
Posted by Bystander
Stalk Stalk
(all you ever do is stalk stalk*)


(updated 4.25.08) In the original Null and Void post (comments section), vulgarian Tom Voigt wrote “Hey fucko, grow some balls and tell us your real name.” Grow some brains, Tom. Do you really expect me to give you, a convicted stalker, my name? You are one restraining order away from going back to jail so stop threatening me. http://www.kake.com/home/headlines/1735321.html (thanks to an annoymous commenter for the great tip)

You can stop sending me Blaine’s identity (it’s in the comments section already via a zodiackiller.com DOJ doc). Anyone know his email address?

Question for convicted serial stalker Tom Voigt. In your two(?) decades as a vigilante/BTK and Zodiac hunter, have you ever apologized to any of the men or their families that you have falsely accused of being serial murderers?

Bystander

* stalk stalk

Unrequited Love? (Purple & Gike 4ever)

2008 April 17
Posted by Bystander
Unrequited Love?
Purple & Gike 4ever

Anyone who doubts that Gaikowski was stalked by Purple Blaine should go over to Voigt’s site and read about how Blaine manipulated Zodiac victim Darlene Ferrin’s sister. You will see how Blaine has been getting other people to harass Gaikowski for decades.
Hey Blaine, rejection is a bitch but you’ve got to get over it. He’s dead. Is Voigt is using his readership to harass Gaikowski the same way Blaine used Ferrin’s sister?

A commenter calling himself Tom Voigt (with an IP from his city of residence) attempted to post six rants. A couple of them are laced with profanities aimed at me. Voigt’s little fiefdom doesn’t allow use of profanities so why would he think it’s okay to curse me at my own site?
Update: 4/18/08 Voigt wrote again to verify that the comments were his so I let them through unedited (in the Null and Void post).

Question for Tom Voigt. In your two(?) decades as an amateur vigilante/BTK and Zodiac hunter, have you ever apologized to any of the men or their families that you have falsely accused of being serial murderers?

Could Bob be TV’s next suspect?

Bystander
Hound dog